It’s important to recognise that the starting lines between the “haves” and “have nots” are unequal to begin with.
The Lien Centre for Social Innovation’s 2015 research study proposes two common contributing factors of increased inequality in Singapore: our economic strategies (such as having ambitious growth rates and a regressive tax system) and our culture of meritocracy.
In our knowledge economy, speed is king. As such, workers who are unable to upgrade their skill sets (despite government skill-upgrading efforts) , due to a lack of resources to begin with, lose out to their higher-skilled or higher-educated counterparts. As a result, they may be left in a state of unemployment.
This is tied to the idea of neoliberalism, an ideology and policy model that “emphasises the value of free market competition” (Britannica) and is “a process that rewards merit and punishes inefficiency”, says political writer George Monbiot.
He adds: “In a world governed by competition, those who fall behind become defined and self-defined as losers.”
In her illuminating book This Is What Inequality Looks Like, Teo You Yenn elucidates the discrimination faced by those living in urban poverty:
There are two prejudices about people who are low income: first, that they have different ‘values’ and ‘mindsets’ - particularly about work ethic and parenting. There is a belief that low-income persons tend to make ‘bad choices’ that perpetuate their poor conditions, particularly when it comes to parenting. Second, that they tend to avoid employment and become reliant on state support. Here the belief is perpetuated through public policies that place ‘dependence’ front and center as that which is to be avoided. Both prejudices are empirically inaccurate and profoundly damaging. (pg 85)
There’s also the issue of social stratification in housing and education which highlights class divides in society – the split between the “elites” and “non-elites”. According to a 2017 study by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Singaporeans who live in public housing have fewer than one friend who lives in private housing. People who attend elite schools are also less likely to have close friendships with those who attend non-elite institutions, and vice versa.
“The lack of social mixing may translate into a lack of empathy for and understanding of those who hail from disadvantaged families… leading to a reluctance to support policies aimed at improving the lots of the lower classes, and contributing towards their welfare,” says NUS Sociologist Professor Tan Ern Ser in this article.